To this I ask what is indeed our mission? When Paul said, in 1 Cor.
You may say no, but the current state of so many of our churches says otherwise. Leaderships are so frustrated with self absorbed members that they are pushing back telling them “church” is not a place to be fed as much as it is a place to come work. Yet, more often than not we are asking people to “go to work” by becoming members of our self perpetuating organizations that engage people in “worship services”, Bible classes and the like hoping that doing so will in the long run benefit their life and that maybe they can get others to join in along the way. Again I ask what is indeed the mission?
So many of us marinate in this Christian sub-culture only occasionally peeking our heads out the door or more often just sending a mass e-mail to rail against smut on television, ungodly politicians, or homeowner’s associations that won’t allow someone to fly an American flag. Listen, those H.O.A.’s annoy me too, but I am convinced that we are known more for what we are against than for the Good News we claim to have. With that, the way that we so often frame this Good News has left a decent amount of “outsiders” saying “If that is the Good News, I don’t want to hear the bad.”
But, week after week, I run across a blog accusing the emergents of making Jesus into a hippie that just loves everyone or of thinking that building a house is enough. The radical love of Jesus is undeniable, but no He wasn’t always happy or found sheepishly asking why we can’t all just get along. But, don’t we realize that the times he was the most confrontational, the most in your face were when he was dealing with the religious of His day. Yet we act like if Jesus were here he would march right over to
Maybe He would tell us that this Good News is dynamic with many layers and that we are poor story tellers. Maybe he would say that we talk endlessly, but we have little action. Maybe he would say that he meant it in Matthew 25 about the food, cup of water, and the clothes thing and that it wasn’t just some spiritual anecdote that really meant He just wanted us to preach more sermons. Maybe he would say redemption, grace, mercy and love have many forms and they all point back to the nature of God whether we connect the dots or not. Maybe he would say that we can’t separate compassion from proclamation because compassion proclaims.
I don’t know any emergent that just wants to feed people and never ever talk about Jesus and his way. But I know plenty of people including myself that have talked hundreds of times more than we have fed. The mission isn’t just to rally around the event of Jesus’s death and resurrection and convince others to do the same. The mission is to be that death and resurrection. There is no end to the ways in which we can indeed be that to the world.
2 comments:
I understand and empathize with the compelling need to reorient ourselves and the church as a whole to Christ's teaching and lifestyle, instead of solely focusing on the aspect of his crucifixion and resurrection. Is there a peaceable process that you believe can bring together the emergents and those who are on the opposite end of the spectrum? Both sides seem frustrated enough to start a fight, and division is contradictory to what both "sides" believe. How do you think there can be peace concerning this, because it is the fundamental orientation of the church's outlook? Is there a point, do you believe, in which a follower of Christ must cease to call themselves a "christian" in order to follow Christ?
Luke,
thanks for the comment and the great questions. I will attempt to respond in my next post. thanks for the dialogue all the way from japan.
Post a Comment